Skip to content
AEO HQ

Example engagement ยท Healthcare: outpatient physical therapy clinics

AEO audit for an outpatient physical therapy group

A hypothetical nine-clinic physical therapy group, used to show how AEO HQ's audit would run in healthcare: prompts, crawler and listing checks, HIPAA-aware measurement, and the report. No results.

An example engagement for a hypothetical company, showing how the audit runs and what it delivers. It is not a client result.

Industry guide: SEO, AEO, and GEO for healthcare companies

The company

ItemProfile (hypothetical)
BusinessNine outpatient physical therapy clinics under one brand in a U.S. metro area of about 2.5 million people
Staff41 licensed physical therapists (PTs), 17 physical therapist assistants, and front-desk staff at each clinic
ServicesOrthopedic, sports, post-surgical, spine, and vestibular (dizziness) care at all clinics; pelvic health at three
PayersCommercial insurance, Medicare, workers' compensation, and self-pay
How patients arriveReferrals from surgeons and primary care practices; self-referral; Google Search and Maps; insurers' directories; word of mouth
Current marketingA WordPress site with a page per clinic and a bio per PT; an appointment form asking for name, phone, insurer, and reason for visit; Google Analytics 4 (GA4) and an advertising pixel on every page; paid search ads; a text after discharge asking for a Google review; blog posts by staff PTs
ListingsA Google Business Profile per clinic; Healthgrades and Zocdoc profiles for some PTs; insurers' directories

Self-referral is possible because all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands allow some form of direct access to physical therapists, with limits that differ by jurisdiction (American Physical Therapy Association; data as of July 2025). Patients also ask assistants: 32% of U.S. adults had used AI for health information or advice (KFF poll of 1,343 adults, early 2026), and 47% of 992 adults surveyed by a reputation-software company had used AI to research healthcare providers (April 2026). No study found for this example measures how assistants choose physical therapy clinics.

The questions patients ask assistants

The panel follows AEO HQ's measurement design: 40 patient intents, each written three ways (120 unbranded prompts), plus 20 branded prompts. Local prompts name a suburb near a clinic, and runs use a connection inside the metro, because ChatGPT may use an approximate location based on the user's IP address. Prompts come from generic questions, never from patient records.

Each prompt runs three times a week on each of the four assistants the audit measures (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews), in a new chat with a clean session; the ten most important prompts run eight times a week. Results are reported as rates with error ranges, not as single answers, because ChatGPT and Google's AI returned the same list of brands less than once in 100 repeated runs (vendor study; 2,961 runs). The table shows 12 of the 140 prompts.

IntentExample prompt (illustrative)What a correct answer needs from the group
Condition"Is physical therapy worth trying for a torn meniscus before surgery?"A condition page by a named PT, with sources
Condition"What helps sciatica besides pain pills?"A spine page on what therapy can and cannot do
Finding a clinic"Best physical therapy near [suburb] for lower back pain"A Business Profile and page for the nearest clinic
Finding a clinic"Physical therapist in [metro] who treats vertigo"A vestibular page naming clinics and PTs
Finding a clinic"Pelvic floor physical therapy in [metro] that takes Medicare"A pelvic health page with clinics and payers
Access"Do I need a doctor's referral to see a physical therapist in [state]?"A dated page on state and payer rules
Access"Physical therapy open Saturdays near [neighborhood]"The same hours on every profile and page
Cost"How much does physical therapy cost without insurance in [metro]?"Published self-pay prices
Cost"Is [brand] in network with [insurer]?"A current insurance page
Comparison"Physical therapist or chiropractor for lower back pain?"A clinician-reviewed explainer with sources
Comparison"[Brand] or [competitor] for ACL rehab?"Checkable facts: testing, staff, locations
Reputation"[Brand] reviews"Review profiles, handled within the rules below

How the assistants reach the clinics

An assistant can cite a clinic page through search only after its search system has crawled and indexed it. The diagrams show the documented routes; how AI assistants find and cite sources has the details.

Search-engine routes to the clinics

Google Search

  1. 01GooglebotCrawls clinic pages, PT bios, and condition pages
  2. 02Google indexIndexed pages eligible for a snippet
  3. 03AI Overviews, AI ModeLink to indexed, snippet-eligible pages

Google local

  1. 01Business ProfilesOne per clinic, plus eligible PTs
    • Name
    • Address
    • Hours
    • Category
  2. 02Local business dataRanked by relevance, distance, and prominence
  3. 03AI responsesCan include local business information

Microsoft

  1. 01BingbotFinds pages through sitemaps and IndexNow
  2. 02Bing indexShared by Bing search and Copilot
  3. 03Microsoft CopilotBuilt on Bing's crawling and index
Google's AI features draw on Google's index and Business Profiles, and Copilot on Bing's index, as each company documents (checked 27 September 2026).

Assistant crawlers and indexes

OpenAI

  1. 01OAI-SearchBotCrawls for ChatGPT search; GPTBot is separate
  2. 02OpenAI index + partnersPartners include Microsoft and local listings
  3. 03ChatGPT searchUses approximate location for local results

Anthropic

  1. 01Claude-SearchBotIndexes pages for Claude's search results
  2. 02Brave Search + own indexBrave's crawler follows Googlebot's rules
  3. 03Claude web searchSearches when facts are current or specific

Perplexity

  1. 01PerplexityBotControlled by robots.txt; not used for training
  2. 02Perplexity indexNo third-party index documented
  3. 03Perplexity answersSurface and link the pages used
ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity reach clinic pages through their own crawlers and search providers, per OpenAI, Anthropic, Brave, and Perplexity documentation (checked 27 September 2026).

Directories carry weight: in 6.8 million citations studied by a listings-management company, listings were 52.6% of healthcare citations, "with WebMD and Vitals and industry-specific directories dominating visibility" (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity; mid-2025). A strong Maps position does not carry over on its own: for dentists, the domains cited by Google and by a web-enabled AI engine overlapped by 11.9% (preprint).

What the audit checks

Crawling, indexing, and page text

Listings and the group's facts

Content that answers patient questions

Health is a "YMYL Health or Safety" topic in Google's rater guidelines, and Google's systems give more weight to strong E-E-A-T (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness) on such topics. Each condition page should name the PT who wrote or reviewed it, link to a bio with license and credentials, show a date, and cite sources.

Rules that limit claims, testimonials, and reviews

RuleWhat it saysWhat the audit checks
HIPAA marketing and testimonialsWith limited exceptions, the Privacy Rule requires written authorization before protected health information (PHI) is used for marketing (opens in a new tab). In September 2025, the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) settled for $182,000 with Cadia Healthcare Facilities, rehabilitation and long-term care providers that had posted 150 patients' PHI as website "success stories" without authorization (opens in a new tab)Every patient story, photo, and video is listed, and the privacy officer confirms an authorization exists for each. AEO HQ does not see them
Review repliesOCR's director said to confirm the Privacy Rule permits a disclosure "before disclosing PHI through social media or public-facing websites" (opens in a new tab)Replies that confirm a reviewer is a patient are flagged (our reading)
Review requestsThe FTC's rule bans fake reviews, incentives tied to a review's sentiment, and review suppression (opens in a new tab); asking only happy customers "could violate the FTC Act" (opens in a new tab). Google bans incentives for any review and selective requests for positive ones (opens in a new tab)The discharge text goes to every patient, offers nothing, and has no rating filter
Health claimsFTC staff guidance requires "competent and reliable scientific evidence" (opens in a new tab) and calls a practitioner's observation of patients "anecdotal." It is written for products; the FTC's substantiation policy covers objective claims about "the item or service advertised" (opens in a new tab) (1984; in force)Outcome claims such as "avoid surgery," each with its evidence
Privacy claimsThe FTC warns against false "HIPAA Compliant," "HIPAA Secure," or "HIPAA Certified" claims (opens in a new tab)Badges and wording on forms and the privacy page
Access statementsDirect-access limits differ by state (opens in a new tab)The referral page matches the state's practice act and payers' rules, with a date

Measurement that stays within HIPAA

HHS's bulletin on tracking technologies says trackers behind a patient login "generally have access to PHI," that a vendor receiving PHI needs a business associate agreement (BAA), that trackers on appointment-scheduling pages "may have access to PHI," and that a cookie banner is not a valid HIPAA authorization. A June 2024 court order vacated only the part covering an IP address linked to a visit to a public page about specific conditions or providers; HHS says it is evaluating next steps. Google offers no BAA for Google Analytics and says HIPAA-regulated customers "may only use Google Analytics on pages that are not HIPAA-covered".

The audit maps every tag on every page type and each vendor that receives data. It recommends measuring AI referrals only on pages the privacy officer and counsel clear, and counting appointment requests by source inside the scheduling system. AEO HQ receives monthly totals and no PHI.

Sample findings

These are sample findings for the hypothetical group, showing the form a finding takes. They describe no real clinic, and nothing in them was measured.

#Finding (sample)Evidence to collectImpactEffortOwner
1The appointment form sends "reason for visit" from a page that loads GA4 and an ad pixelNetwork log of each tag; form fields; vendors and BAAsHigh: possible PHI disclosure; settle before adding measurementMediumPrivacy officer, web developer, counsel
2robots.txt blocks OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, and PerplexityBot, though the aim was to opt out of trainingrobots.txt; logs by user agentHigh: ChatGPT search does not show sites that block OAI-SearchBotLowWeb developer; leadership decides
3Addresses, hours, and insurers load through a JavaScript clinic finderRaw HTML compared with the rendered pageHigh for local and insurance promptsMediumWeb developer
4Two Business Profiles add the neighborhood to the brand name; the signs do notProfile names; photos of signsMedium: breaks Google's chain naming ruleLowOperations director
5A clinic that moved in 2025 shows its old address on Healthgrades and one insurer's directoryListing exports; dated screenshots; branded-prompt answersHigh for that clinicLowFront-desk lead
6Three "success story" pages name patients and describe their surgeryPage list; privacy officer's check for authorizationsHigh: the Cadia patternLow to removePrivacy officer
7Some review replies mention the reviewer's treatmentSample of replies from all nine profilesHigh: public disclosure riskLowOperations director, privacy officer
8The discharge text asks only patients who scored 9 or 10 for a reviewText workflow settingsHigh: Google bans selective requestsLowOperations director
9The spine page says "most patients avoid surgery" and cites no studyThe claim; the evidence relied onMedium: substantiation; assistants may repeat itMediumClinical director
10The referral page says "No referral needed" without state or payer limitsPractice act; payer policies; date checkedMedium: patients ask this directlyLowClinical director, billing manager
11Condition pages lack author, reviewer, and date; 12 of 41 bios lack credentialsPage-by-page auditMedium: trust signals on health topicsMediumMarketing manager, clinical director

The deliverable

The report has nine parts, followed by a readout call.

  1. Summary. Scope, dates, assistants tested, and the ten fixes to make first.
  2. Method. The full panel, session controls, run counts, matching rules, and statistics.
  3. Baseline measurement. For each assistant: mention rate, citation rate, share of voice against named competing clinics, and accuracy on branded prompts, each with a 95% interval; and the cited domains, sorted into the group's pages, directories, insurers, and publishers. No pooled score and no rank.
  4. Crawler access and indexing. A table by user agent (allowed, blocked in robots.txt, blocked at the CDN), index coverage in Google and Bing, and the rendering check.
  5. Listings and fact sheet. One fact sheet per clinic and a table of mismatches across profiles and directories.
  6. Content gaps. Each intent mapped to a page or marked as a gap.
  7. Claims and privacy items. Each with the rule text and a link, for the privacy officer and counsel to decide. AEO HQ flags these items; it gives no legal or HIPAA compliance advice and does not review clinical accuracy.
  8. Priority fix list and measurement plan. Every finding with impact, effort, owner, and evidence, and the plan below.
  9. Run log. Every answer and citation from the baseline, as a spreadsheet.

Measurement plan

The plan follows how to measure AI visibility: rates use Wilson intervals, which suit small samples, and a change counts only when the interval for the difference excludes zero.

MetricMethodFrequencyTool
Mention rate on unbranded prompts, per assistantShare of runs naming the group; Wilson interval; cluster bootstrap by intentWeekly runs; 4-week windowsTracking tool or spreadsheet run log
Citation rate and cited domainsShare of runs citing a group page; domains sorted by typeSameSame
Share of voiceGroup mentions divided by mentions of 5 to 10 named competitorsSameSame
Accuracy20 branded prompts graded against the fact sheetEvery 4 weeksRun log and fact sheet
Listing consistencyField-by-field comparison across profiles and directoriesMonthlyListings spreadsheet
AI Overviews and AI Mode impressionsGenerative AI performance report, which counts impressions, not clicks (opens in a new tab)MonthlySearch Console
Copilot citationsAI Performance report (opens in a new tab)MonthlyBing Webmaster Tools
Crawler and fetcher requestsLogs by user agent, including Claude-User, which fetches a page for a live answerMonthlyServer or CDN logs
AI referral visitsAI Assistant channel (opens in a new tab) plus a custom channel, on cleared pages onlyMonthlyGA4
New patients by self-reported source"How did you hear about us?" at intake, with AI assistants as options; totals onlyMonthlyPractice-management system

Engagement timeline

The pricing page gives the audit's current delivery time; this example assumes about two weeks from completed intake.

WeekActivities
IntakeRead-only access to Search Console, Bing Webmaster Tools, GA4, the site, and the Business Profiles; the fact sheet; 5 to 10 competitors; a named privacy officer; a written rule that no PHI is shared with AEO HQ
Week 1Crawl and crawler-access checks; tag, listings, and claims inventories; panel drafted, reviewed by the group, and frozen; baseline runs start
Week 2Runs finish; coding and accuracy grading; findings ranked; privacy and claims items sent to the privacy officer; report and readout call
After deliveryThe group runs the measurement plan on its own schedule

How the example audit runs

Measure

  1. 01Prompt panel40 intents in 3 phrasings, plus 20 branded
  2. 02Repeated runsNew chat per run, fixed metro location
  3. 03CodingMentions, citations, and facts checked by a person
  4. 04Baseline ratesPer assistant, with 95% intervals

Fix

  1. 01FindingsEach tied to evidence and an owner
  2. 02Privacy and claims reviewPrivacy officer and counsel decide
  3. 03Priority fix listOrdered by impact and effort
  4. 04Re-measureSame panel in 4-week windows
Prompts
140
Assistants run
4
Runs per prompt per week
3 (8 for top 10)
Baseline window
2 weeks
The measurement and fix steps of this example audit, with a privacy and claims review before any change goes live; this is AEO HQ's method, not a platform process.

What this example does not show

  • Results. No rates, citations, traffic, or patient numbers, because the group does not exist. No study has measured how long changes like these take to show up in AI answers.
  • Real prompts. A real panel comes from the group's intake calls, front-desk questions, and Search Console queries.
  • Legal or clinical conclusions. HIPAA, practice acts, and payer rules are summarized, not applied; the privacy officer and counsel decide, and the group's clinicians judge clinical content.
  • Evidence specific to physical therapy. The surveys and citation studies cited cover healthcare in general, and several come from companies that sell related services.
  • Every assistant. Runs cover four assistants. Copilot and Google AI Mode appear only through Microsoft's and Google's reports, and Claude only through logs and referrals.

Next step

The audit's current scope, price, and delivery time are on the pricing page. The healthcare industry page covers AEO for healthcare more broadly, and the methodology page gives the full measurement design.

Next step

Find out who AI recommends.

Book the audit to see where you rank, where AI cites you, and where competitors win. The full audit price credits toward the Blueprint within 30 days.