Skip to content
AEO HQ

Example engagement ยท Fintech: B2B payments and accounts payable automation

AEO audit for a B2B payments and AP automation company

A hypothetical B2B payments and AP automation company, used to show how AEO HQ's audit would run in fintech: buyer prompts, crawler checks, a register of regulated claims, and the report. No results.

An example engagement for a hypothetical company, showing how the audit runs and what it delivers. It is not a client result.

Industry guide: SEO, AEO, and GEO for fintech and financial services

The company

ItemProfile (hypothetical)
ProductAP software and payments: invoice capture, approval routing, sync with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, and payment by ACH, virtual card, check, and international wire
SizeAbout 220 employees; founded in 2017; based in the United States
CustomersAbout 1,400 mid-market companies (100 to 2,000 employees), mostly in manufacturing, distribution, and construction
BuyersControllers, AP managers, and CFOs; IT reviews security and integrations
Money movementThrough a sponsor bank and licensed payment partners. Customer funds awaiting payout sit in for-benefit-of accounts at partner banks. The company is not a bank
PricingA subscription tiered by invoice volume, fees on some payment types, and a share of card interchange
How buyers find itPeer referrals, ERP partner marketplaces, accounting firms that run outsourced AP, review sites, analyst reports, search, and webinars
Current marketingA blog and gated guides; comparison pages against three competitors; a security page; a G2 review campaign that paid gift cards; site claims such as "AI invoice capture with 99.5% accuracy," "funds are FDIC insured," and "licensed in all 50 states"

In a G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software buyers (March 2026), 51% said they start research in an AI chatbot more often than in Google, and 45% said citations from software review sites are the most confidence-inspiring signal in an AI answer. In a TrustRadius survey of 1,862 technology buyers, 63% used AI during their purchase, and 94% of those fact-check its answers at least some of the time (July 2026). Both publishers run review platforms, and neither survey is specific to payments software.

The questions buyers ask assistants

The panel follows AEO HQ's measurement design: 40 buyer intents, each written three ways (120 unbranded prompts), plus 20 branded prompts. Each prompt runs three times a week on each of the four assistants the audit measures (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews), in a new chat with a clean session; the ten most important prompts run eight times a week. Results are reported as rates with error ranges, because ChatGPT and Google's AI returned the same list of brands less than once in 100 repeated runs (vendor study; 2,961 runs). The branded prompts also test the facts that carry legal weight: deposit insurance, licenses, and security reports. The table shows 13 of the 140 prompts; competitors appear as placeholders.

IntentExample prompt (illustrative)What a correct answer needs from the company
Category"Best accounts payable automation software for a mid-size manufacturer"A page stating who the product fits, with checkable facts
Category"AP automation that syncs two-way with NetSuite"A page per ERP: sync direction, records, and limits
Category"How can we pay international suppliers in their own currency?"Currencies, countries, fees, and timing in plain text
Problem"How do we stop fraud when a vendor changes bank details?"What the product checks, and what it does not
Problem"How do virtual card rebates work for accounts payable?"How rebates are earned and what they depend on
Comparison"[Brand] vs [competitor] for a multi-entity company"A dated comparison page with sources
Comparison"[Competitor] alternatives for companies on Sage Intacct"The same, for each ERP
Pricing"How much does AP automation cost per invoice?"A published pricing model
Pricing"Does [brand] charge suppliers a fee to get paid?"A fees page covering payers and payees
Trust"Is [brand] SOC 2 compliant?"The report type, period, and how to request it
Trust"Are funds held by [brand] FDIC insured?"A statement that meets the FDIC rule below
Trust"Is [brand] a licensed money transmitter?"License facts that match regulator records
Implementation"How long does AP automation take to set up with NetSuite?"Typical steps and time ranges from the company's records

How the assistants reach the company

An assistant can cite a page through search only after its search system has crawled and indexed it. The diagrams show the documented routes; how AI assistants find and cite sources has the details.

Search-engine routes to the company

Google Search

  1. 01GooglebotCrawls product, pricing, and help pages
    • ERP pages
    • Pricing
    • Help center
    • Security
  2. 02Google indexIndexed pages eligible for a snippet
  3. 03AI Overviews, AI ModeLink to indexed, snippet-eligible pages

Microsoft

  1. 01BingbotFinds pages through sitemaps and IndexNow
  2. 02Bing indexShared by Bing search and Copilot
  3. 03Microsoft CopilotBuilt on Bing's crawling and index
Google's AI features draw on Google's index, and Copilot on Bing's crawl and index, as each company documents (checked 27 September 2026).

Assistant crawlers and indexes

OpenAI

  1. 01OAI-SearchBotCrawls for ChatGPT search; GPTBot is separate
  2. 02OpenAI index + partnersSearch partners include Microsoft
  3. 03ChatGPT searchRewrites queries; placement is not guaranteed

Anthropic

  1. 01Claude-SearchBotIndexes pages for Claude's search results
  2. 02Brave Search + own indexBrave's crawler follows Googlebot's rules
  3. 03Claude web searchSearches when facts are current or specific

Perplexity

  1. 01PerplexityBotControlled by robots.txt; not used for training
  2. 02Perplexity indexNo third-party index documented
  3. 03Perplexity answersSurface and link the pages used
ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity reach the company's pages through their own crawlers and search providers, per OpenAI, Anthropic, Brave, and Perplexity documentation (checked 27 September 2026).

Third-party pages carry much of the weight in software answers. In 680 million citations studied by a visibility-tracking vendor, G2 was among the ten most-cited domains on ChatGPT and Perplexity, and Gartner on Google AI Overviews and Perplexity (August 2024 to June 2025). In an SEO agency's study of about 1,000 decision-stage prompts, Reddit appeared in about 62% of responses, and "X vs. Y" pages and listicles were the most-cited formats (early 2026). Both publishers sell related services.

What the audit checks

Which rules apply

The audit first records which regimes govern the company's marketing, as working assumptions for counsel to confirm.

RegimeWho it coversWorking assumption
SEC Marketing RuleInvestment advisers "registered or required to be registered" (opens in a new tab)Out of scope; revisit if the company markets investment products, such as yield on balances through a partner
FINRA Rule 2210FINRA member firms; a "retail communication" reaches more than 25 retail investors within 30 days and generally needs a principal's approval (opens in a new tab)Out of scope for the same reason
CFPB authority over unfair, deceptive, or abusive practicesCovered persons (opens in a new tab) offering consumer financial products; a consumer is "an individual," (opens in a new tab) and the product is offered "primarily for personal, family, or household purposes"Likely outside for a product sold only to businesses
FTC Act"Unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce" (opens in a new tab); banks are exceptedIn scope, since the company is not a bank. The FTC's Evolv case (opens in a new tab) concerned claims made to schools, stadiums, and hospitals
FDIC Part 328"No person may knowingly make false or misleading representations about deposit insurance" (opens in a new tab)In scope for every statement about FDIC insurance
State money transmission licensingNMLS is "the system of record for non-depository financial services licensing" in participating states (opens in a new tab)License statements are checked against NMLS Consumer Access

The claims register

The audit lists every claim on the site, in help docs, on review profiles, and on comparison pages, with the evidence each needs. Four kinds carry the most risk.

Pages, access, and facts

Measurement setup

GA4 has a default AI Assistant channel, and ChatGPT adds utm_source=chatgpt.com to its links, but links from Claude's app carry no referrer. The audit checks that the demo form asks "How did you hear about us?" with AI assistants as options and stores the answer in the CRM. In one agency's records, first-touch attribution credited AI with 28 of the 189 leads who named an AI tool (single firm; weak).

Sample findings

These are sample findings for the hypothetical company, showing the form a finding takes. They describe no real company, and nothing in them was measured.

#Finding (sample)Evidence to collectImpactEffortOwner
1The home page says "funds are FDIC insured" without naming partner banks, saying the company is not a bank, or noting pass-through conditionsClaim text; bank agreements; account structureHigh: FDIC Part 328Low to rewordCompliance lead, counsel
2"99.5% invoice-capture accuracy" has no documented testSample size, document types, scoring method, dateHigh: substantiation; assistants repeat numbersMediumProduct marketing, data science, counsel
3"Licensed in all 50 states" does not match NMLS records; in some states the company operates through a licensed partnerNMLS Consumer Access records; partner agreementsHigh: misstates regulatory statusLowCompliance lead
4The security page says "SOC 2 certified" and "bank-level security"SOC 2 report type, period, and auditorMediumLowSecurity lead, marketing
5The help center's robots.txt blocks all crawlers, and payment timing and currencies appear only thererobots.txt per host; index coverageHigh for payment and currency promptsLowSupport operations, web developer
6NetSuite and Sage Intacct integration details load with JavaScriptRaw HTML compared with the rendered pageHigh for ERP promptsMediumWeb developer
7Payment timing differs across the site ("same day"), help docs ("one to two business days"), and the G2 profileThe three statements; product recordsMedium: assistants may repeat any versionLowProduct marketing
8Pricing appears only as "Contact sales"; the one public price is in a 2023 articleSite pages; public price mentionsMediumLowMarketing, finance
9Comparison pages quote competitors' 2024 prices without dates or sourcesThe pages; competitors' current pagesMedium: comparative claimsMediumProduct marketing, counsel
10G2 reviews copied onto the site omit that reviewers received gift cardsCampaign records; site pagesMedium: undisclosed material connectionLowCustomer marketing
11An unrelated consumer app shares the brand name, and the Organization markup has no legalName or sameAsSearch results for the name; markup checkMedium: entity confusionLowWeb developer

The deliverable

The report has nine parts, followed by a readout call.

  1. Summary. Scope, dates, assistants tested, and the ten fixes to make first.
  2. Method. The full panel, session controls, run counts, matching rules, and statistics.
  3. Baseline measurement. For each assistant: mention rate, citation rate, share of voice against named competitors, and accuracy on branded prompts, each with a 95% interval. Accuracy on deposit insurance, licenses, security reports, and fees is reported separately. No pooled score and no rank.
  4. Crawler access and indexing. A table by user agent and host, index coverage in Google and Bing, and the rendering check.
  5. Claims register. Each claim, where it appears, the rule, the evidence on file, and suggested wording for counsel's review. AEO HQ flags; it gives no legal or compliance advice.
  6. Third-party profiles. Fact mismatches across review sites and ERP marketplaces, and the domains assistants cite.
  7. Content gaps. Each intent mapped to a page or marked as a gap.
  8. Priority fix list and measurement plan. Every finding with impact, effort, owner, and evidence, and the plan below.
  9. Run log. Every answer and citation from the baseline, as a spreadsheet.

Measurement plan

The plan follows how to measure AI visibility: rates use Wilson intervals, which suit small samples, and a change counts only when the interval for the difference excludes zero.

MetricMethodFrequencyTool
Mention rate on unbranded prompts, per assistantShare of runs naming the company; Wilson interval; cluster bootstrap by intentWeekly runs; 4-week windowsTracking tool or spreadsheet run log
Citation rate and cited domainsShare of runs citing a company page; domains sorted into own site, review sites, forums, and publishersSameSame
Share of voiceCompany mentions divided by mentions of 5 to 10 named competitorsSameSame
Accuracy on regulated facts20 branded prompts graded against the approved fact sheet; each wrong answer traced to the page it citesEvery 4 weeksRun log and fact sheet
AI Overviews and AI Mode impressionsGenerative AI performance report, which counts impressions, not clicks (opens in a new tab)MonthlySearch Console
Copilot citationsAI Performance report (opens in a new tab)MonthlyBing Webmaster Tools
Crawler and fetcher requestsLogs by user agent, including ChatGPT-User, which fetches a page for a live answerMonthlyServer or CDN logs
AI referral visits and demo requestsAI Assistant channel plus a custom channel, with demo requests as key eventsMonthlyGA4
Pipeline by self-reported sourceDemo-form answer stored on the contact and the dealMonthlyCRM

Engagement timeline

The pricing page gives the audit's current delivery time; this example assumes about two weeks from completed intake.

WeekActivities
IntakeRead-only access to Search Console, Bing Webmaster Tools, GA4, the site, and a CRM report; the fact sheet; 5 to 10 competitors; a named compliance lead and counsel contact
Week 1Crawl of every host; crawler-access checks; claims register built from the site, docs, and profiles; panel drafted, reviewed, and frozen; baseline runs start
Week 2Runs finish; coding and grading; findings ranked; claims register sent to counsel; report and readout call
After deliveryThe company runs the measurement plan; claims that counsel rewrites are re-tested with the branded prompts

Review path for regulated claims

Claim

  1. 01Claims registerEvery claim on the site, docs, and profiles
    • FDIC
    • Licenses
    • SOC reports
    • AI accuracy
  2. 02Evidence fileTest data, bank agreements, NMLS records
  3. 03Counsel reviewThe company's counsel approves or rewrites
  4. 04Publish with disclosureDisclosure beside the claim it qualifies

Check

  1. 01Branded promptsAsk about FDIC, fees, licenses, and SOC 2
  2. 02Grade answersAgainst the approved fact sheet
  3. 03Trace wrong answersRecord the page each wrong answer cites
Prompts
140
Branded prompts
20
Assistants run
4
Baseline window
2 weeks
How this example audit handles claims about deposit insurance, licenses, security reports, and AI accuracy: AEO HQ flags them, and the company's counsel decides.

What this example does not show

  • Results. No rates, citations, traffic, or pipeline figures, because the company does not exist. No study has measured how long changes like these take to show up in AI answers.
  • Real prompts. A real panel comes from sales calls, support tickets, and Search Console queries.
  • Legal conclusions. The scoping table records working assumptions, not rulings. Counsel decides, and state money transmission laws differ.
  • Evidence specific to payments. The buyer surveys cover B2B software in general, and the citation studies come from companies that sell related services.
  • Every assistant. Runs cover four assistants. Copilot and Google AI Mode appear only through Microsoft's and Google's reports, and Claude only through logs and referrals.

Next step

The audit's current scope, price, and delivery time are on the pricing page. The fintech industry page covers AEO for financial companies more broadly, and the methodology page gives the full measurement design.

Next step

Find out who AI recommends.

Book the audit to see where you rank, where AI cites you, and where competitors win. The full audit price credits toward the Blueprint within 30 days.